existent open wide free dog (star) descended.
versus the Bible story about 2 men Joshua and Caleb who crossed the Jordan River
The dog star, the sun star, was renamed Serius by the Greeks and the Bible interpreters called it Caleb. All English renditions of the Bible state they are translated from the KING JAMES BIBLE according to the GREEK.
The original stories were not written Greek. They were written, mostly in Hebrew with words from the languages of Babylonian, Chaldean, Hebrew, Aramaic, Egyptian, Persian and a variety of other languages; some unidentified.
So let us look at another story about the existent open wide free dog (star) from the original text..
existent open wide free builds perpetuity….dog(star) builds, (what) will be prepared
vs Joshua the son of Nun….Caleb the son of Jephunneh.
Which view the original text or the religious myth view gives us the most information? Let us look at a specific scripture.
Numbers 26:65 For the LORD had said of them, They shall surely die in the wilderness. And there was not left a man of them, save…Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun.
If the existent open wide free dog(star) was all that was left….then there was still the sun in the heavens.
- If Caleb and Joshua were the only human male beings left….how did they reproduce themselves?
- How do two male persons bring forth life? In order to answer this question; other myths have to be created to substantiate the religious myth that the existent open wide free dog(star) was two male persons.
What if we use the original viewpoint and let the words of the original text tell us their stories? Instead of the long held religious viewpoint that existed long before the first Bible was released to the general public. Evidences exist all over the world’ cathedrals, monasteries with depictions of Crucifixions built long before the Bible was developed for the masses.
The Bible was simply a way to reinforce the long held religious beliefs and a way to keep the masses aligned with those beliefs….saying this book is the WORD OF GOD and MUST BE OBEYED. Question is which God? Whose God?
Thus 1100+ interpretations of the Bible trying to figure out how to obey something that seems so contrary. Something that is interpreted by thousands of different denominations and non-denominations, as well as the general public. None agreeing with each other; just what we are to obey.
The new database will make this a much simpler task. The information at the back of the James Strong Exhaustive Concordance, the numbering reference system is being brought into a a different format….same information….just much simpler, faster and easier to use than the hard copy.
Everyone can search for themselves and decide what they choose to believe….the long held religious myths about human beings or the beautiful stories about creation and its processes.
This database does not replace the hard copy; but is an addendum to it, to facilitate an easier way to explore, so each one can come to their own conclusions. There is only one of us. one human race; time for us to get it together. Not as clones; but as beautiful individual expressions of creation. Everything is our elder and we the little kid on the block have much to learn.
We will be able to pull up all sorts of data, such as the primitive root words and see what grows on them. Compare them at a glance. We will not find oranges growing on grape vines; nor apples on a cherry tree.
For the first time we will be able to pull up all of the unused root words; which were not assigned a number by the JSE team; but were identified and the meanings of those unused root words was given. Now they can be broken out and see what grows on them.
We will be able to pull out all of the puncturedfemale and rememberedmale words and see they gave absolutely nothing to do with gender. Have everything to do with form and function and how the authors used the same words in different ways.
There are not many words in the original texts; just a lot of repetitions…these can now be reduced down into a simple dictionary of the simple meanings of the original text.
1688BC author unknown, place unknown. This story is placed in the Bible in the first book; so named by interpreters as Genesis, the generating, the generator…….
The flaming sword that guards the eastern gate continually destroys the vanity of night. The vanity of night continually yields to the strength of sunlight and is replaced by the shadow.
From the shadow mortality is resurrected every dawning of a new day. Mortality grows in the strength of the sunlight and is given rest in the vanity of night.
This simple story of how we saw day, night and dawn interacting is totally misrepresented in a religious myth. A myth that has been repeated countless number of times as the WORD OF GOD. Question is what kind of God tells this kind of story? Which of the 16 different words interpreted as meaning God is being referred to?
THE RELIGIOUS MYTH
“A man named Cain slew his brother named Abel due to jealousy. The man named Abel was replaced by the brother named Set, Seth. The man named Cain was forever banned to wander.”
Perhaps this religious myth has some merit in teaching how not to treat our brothers. However it has not worked. Brother still kills brother and perhaps so because this action has been carefully reconstructed over and over. Children are literal and they do what they see and hear adults doing. When adults claim to have the religious truth it binds the children even more into weird beliefs and creates misshaped humans. The beauty of human divinity is distorted into ugly laws of cannots.
As a result of believing this religious myth; we have sealed up the stone gate of a human built city which means founded peaceful. A stone wall that we built to protect ourselves and keep out our brothers.
How can we build a wall high enough and seal the gate strong enough to keep out the resurrection of the sunlight every morning?
HOW DID WE ARRIVE AT THE RELIGIOUS MYTH?
First of all we took the transliterated groups of letters that represent the meanings of flaming sword, vanity and replacement and put capital letters on them. Which in effect makes them look like names. Names of persons that we created in order to tell the religious murder myth.
Then we added a whole lot of English words to create the story about a brother murdering his brother. A story no doubt already recited for hundreds of years before the book titled BIBLE was ever mass produced for a population that could neither read nor write.
Then we told the RELIGIOUS MYTH that this is the WORD OF GOD and must be obeyed. We must not kill per another story in another writing.
The other writing is the so called list of commandments, laws. Laws are what prevent; they do not allow.
“Thou shalt not kill” is recited as the first commandment of GOD. Taught as if it is an instruction of what not to do. When it is actually a statement of what is impossible to do….kill.
Death is a lie; life cannot die. Life continually changes form and we call that death; but it is actually a statement of the the perpetually motion of life. Something human cannot destroy; cannot kill. It is a statement of fact; not a law forbidding.
We think and we teach that when something changes form, the leaf falls from the tree that it is dead. It is not dead; has only lost its form. If all the fallen plants, animals, insects, birds, reptiles and humans that have so called DIED then the mother earth, an estimated 17 billion years old would be a cesspool of rotting stinking death.
Instead the mother earth has never ceased to bring forth new forms of life. Human is just one of the more recent creations.
Is not the flaming sword of the east the life giver (so named Eve)? Does not the flaming sword of the east have the strength of sunlight (so called Samson)? Is it not resurrected every morning?
The writings from which the Bible was interpreted (there is no translation) are life giving examples of creation. They are not religious moral myths intended to control the masses and make them into religious clones. Clones that are mere puppets whose strings are pulled by the religious habits of religious myths repeated for eons of time.
It is time to reclaim the ancient truths of creation we wrote about and stop being religious parrots? Parrots mimic the speaker. Why do we believe that the religious myths are the truth?
Peter, the wolf climbed over into the sheepfold; scaring the sheep into submission. The sheep think they are parrots repeating the religious myths of the wolf.
Up until now it has been an extremely difficult task to reclaim the truth of the original writings. The reformed information contained in the JSE and put into a web based database will facilitate the reclamation project. This project has been 20 years in the making and is still in process. For anyone interested in what the manuscripts from which the Bible was interpreted actually had to say; it will be possible to rediscover, recreate the original stories.
These stories are not religious murder myths. The religious myth that the New Testament stands apart from the old is impossible. Take out all of the words in the NT that refer back to the OT and there is no story line.
Compared to today’s world of instant communication. We also have the ability to drive cross country, fly around the world, to the moon, space travel, etc. was not present at the time of our writings 1845BC to 410BC.
We remained in a static place and viewed the movie screen of the heavens above us. We observed those movements, the cycles of change, the consistencies and the inconsistencies. We saw the world of animals, plants around us revealed on that movie screen.
This is the place we wrote from, the place of a static planet and a moving heaven. There is no evidence of us writing about people in the heavens or anywhere else. We named the stars after the animals and plants,our elders. We wrote their story.
This time frame 1845BC to 410BC is when we documented our view of the creation processes. Around 70AD we rewrote those same stories.
Life was simpler then; but the pen was not confused about what it wrote. We confused those writings by infusing words that matched the religious myths that had abounded upon the planet long before the ability to mass print documents.
The Bible that was printed for a mass of people who could neither read nor write became a textbook.. English and German textbooks for teaching language. Purported by religious leaders as the WORD OF GOD. What God?
Unfortunately we also used this book to purport our religious beliefs upon the planet and demanded that everyone adhere to its teachings. Problem is everyone has a different interpretation of what that book means.
The past 20 years of researching using the Strong Bridge, the JSE and the King James Bible to which it was keyed has revealed a very different story than the one taught around the world.
I was not surprised that the Old Testament could be deciphered based upon word trees that grow from primitive roots. That is after removing all of the words added in to make it grammatically correct.
I am even more amazed that the New Testament has no basis except the Old. Despite the religous teachings that the OLD has nothing to do with the NEW.
Take away all of the words that are connected to the Old and there is nothing left but an empty shell. Same empty shell as the teachings about a human male God seated on the throne somewhere out there, just waiting for the human children to mess up.
What kind of God creates and then destroys its own creation? answer…..the HUMAN GOD that wars against itself….demanding that everyone adhere to its will and desires.
Time for us to grow up, throw away our weapons of warfare and beat them into plowshares.
Time to put on the mantle of the Egyptian Treasury of Glorious Rest and ADD in…..time to stop subtracting (killing) that which we do not agree with.
Time to revisit the simple narrow view; everything is our elder. We saw it in the heavens and we wrote about it.
We, human are the littlest kid on the block. Today’s human is the 22nd version of humanity according to our estimations. What kind of human species are we building?
p.s. when my research is complete there will be an easier way to uncover the original text. That is if anyone so desires to know what our pen actually scribed 1845BC to 70AD.
James Strong Concordance has been around since the mid 1800’s.
This is a work of more than 100 people that gave us the Strong Bridge back to our original text. Given to us after more than 300 years after the Bible was translated for the commoner.
Studying primitive roots and the trees formed from them, is an excellent way to understand and uncover our hidden stories. Hidden under a pile of religious myths.
A circular root word (see graphic below) that is especially informative and sheds great light on the religious myth about a body of a male person being cut into and a rib taken out and a female person being formed.
Totally contrary to the scripture that says we are without excuse. Just look around at the creation and see how it works. Where in the creation around us; do we see anything like this religious myth?
The primitive circular root helps us to reclaim the story. However, the new, updated version of the JSE which has removed thousands of numbers to specific words, obliterating the trail of meanings, has also changed some numbers.
Specifically #5967 has been changed to #6763 in the Chaldean book of the JUDGE RULES with STRENGTH from STRENGTH from the TWIST translated as Daniel. Written about 606/616 -536 BC in Babylon and Sushan. Why was this number changed?
Let us look at what the circular root word has to tell us about #5967. Before that let us look at the JUDGE RULES with STRENGTH from STRENGTH from the TWIST.
STRENGTH from STRENGTH from the TWIST is one of the word recipes used to create the word GOD. The basis of thousands of other words, translated and taught as if they are human beings. If so then Daniel is half human, half God. These words are examined from time to time on this site.
Primitive root TO CURVE is fed by the word that has both a neutral and punctured female
component. Whether we use the neutral RIB or the punctured female RIB that feeds the CURVE to create a curved RIB/RIB, there is no REMEMBERED MALE component.
Why, because there is no gender in our writings. Creation and its’ processes are not gender based functions.
The word rib/rib is not plural. There are no ribs/ribs. There are no male gender ribs.
Gender is the basis for all of the religious myths that have clouded what our pen scribed 1845BCc to70AD. (more…)