It would seem logical that the learned church fathers who prepared the manuscripts for the printing of the KJB would have had access to the original texts. The texts from which they interpreted the 66 books. The same text used almost 300 years later by the team of 100 scholars used to shed light upon the original writings.
If so, then why did they only translate a handful of innocuous words? Words whose true meanings would not in any way detract from the religious myths that had been taught for hundreds of years.
Why did they use the transliterated groups of letters; which were not words. But represent the true meaning in the original languages. Why in some cases did they give us the meaning of those transliterated groups of letters. Then using the same group of transliterated letters add a capital, which was then used as a word; instead of the true meaning of the word? Capital letters infer the name of some person, place or important thing.
If on the other hand, for some reason, they did not have access to the same original documents as the 100 scholars that developed the James Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance; then what did they use as the basis for the Biblical stories? Stories, i.e. religious myths that had been taught for hundreds of years prior to the Bible.
Not to mention the glut of added English words to tell the myths.
Revelation tells us that it is a very little book; sweet in the mouth; bitter in the belly. Bitters are digestive aids. First we must digest out all of those added English words. Then use the true meaning of words used by the original authors.
What is left is a very tiny book. What is noticeable absent is the concepts of sin, shame, blame, guilt, judgement, condemnation, etc. What we discover is the view of the authors who scribed the 66 books between 1845BC to 70AD. A view of creation, the passing of the ages; the stories written in the heavens.
There are no translations. There is only interpretations and thousands of other Bibles all based on the KJB. None of the original texts were written in Latin, nor Greek. They were written in Chaldean and Hebrew using words from many different languages, Persian, Babylonian, Aramaic, Egyptian, Oriental, Syrian, etc. Not to mention words whose original languages were not identified. None of these languages use capital letters.
From the viewpoint of the unique language of the 66 books that are the foundation of the Bible; we see that there is only THIS. THAT is only an extension; an expansion of THIS. THIS is inclusive of all that ever was, is or will be.
Today we use the words this and that as separators of them and us, you and me; divisions that cause exclusions, wars, divisiveness, anger, angst and dis-ease.
What if we took the view from the past and saw only THIS,…ONE…nothing else?
There is much more to THIS viewpoint of the past. 14 different words with 14 different meanings were interpreted as THIS. We must not lose the rabbit trail of the past.
Newer editions of the JSE have removed the ancient landmarks….the numbers applied by the JSE team…most likely due to thinking that we know what the word THIS MEANS.
In today’s world we understand….The viewpoint of the 66 books have quite a different view point. There is THIS, THIS and SHEEP (all three of these are interpreted as the neutral this, known today to identify something close by.
If you have been following the blogs then you understand the difference between the black, blue and red words. Their functions are quite different and quite important in understanding the unique language of 1845BC to 70AD
The three words mentioned above appear more than 400 times each, that is more than 1200 scriptures where the true meaning is buried under today’s THIS. With no way to discover the true meaning…..unless we go back to the 1940 edition of the JSE.
The new database about to be released on this website will preserve and make user friendly the JSE dictionary portion. However, unless we are careful to maintain the integrity of the original work that connects specific numbers to specific scriptures…..we will lose the work of more than 100 persons ……person who by hand with pen and paper documented and gave to us a way to understand the original text.
Do we care enough to dig deeper? Look more closer. See from a different point of view?
Do we carel whether or not future generations will have access to this incredible work?
Or not???? Or do we prefer to continue passing on the religious myths that abound upon the planet? We do have choice. We do have free will.
Where does the word Satan come from?
In the original text of the OLD Testament there a word that means opponent is TRANSLITERATED into the letters s a t a n. Religious interpreters of the New Testament made the s a capital letter and treated the four letters as a word, i.e Satan.
Transliterated letters are not words. They are symbolic of the original word. We use this all the time in going back and forth between languages.
To be translated the letters s a t a n must result in a word that is equal to opponent.
When the letter s was made a capital letter it inferred in English that it was the name of a person, place or important thing. Religion teaches that the word Satan is a spiritual being that desires to destroy humans. Cannot answer the question, who/what created Satan? Or at best says that God made Satan to teach us lessons.
Interestingly another word that means hurtful was INTERPRETED as meaning a masculine devil. But these words were used in the Bible…bad, evil, grievous, harm, lewd, malicious, wicked, wickedness. Wonder why masculine devil was not used? These are English chosen words they are not word meanings taken from the original text. (more…)
Below is a sample of a few word meanings that are vital keys to understanding. Don’t bother looking for these word meanings in the KJB. You might find that the INTERPRETERS used these English words; but they are not the unnumbered word meanings, that is being referred to.
These word meanings and many more will be explored in greater depth once the database is complete. This is but a tiny sample of unnumbered words whose meanings were given by the JSE team in the mid 1800s.
The JSE field is ripe and full of a rich, harvestable, easily digestible, kernels of truth. Not possible to harvest this field until today when we have the resources to produce a color coded database that breaks out the into separate fields of information easily used by even a novice biblical scholar. Fields which can be split into smaller fields of discovery.
When we place these words in their proper place in the KJB scriptures….much is revealed.
When we look at all the words that use these unnumbered words to form other words…the light of understanding begins to shine through. The light of understanding helps us to see what the original authors actually wrote about….THE CREATION STORY as seen from the many different vantage points of places and time 1845BC to 70AD.
Just these two viewpoints alone help us to determine for each of ourselves…what the authors intended to convey as opposed to the RELIGIOUS MYTHS that have been taught.
Many different ways to explore the original text is made available by the new database. This database is not giving any new information…. it is simply giving the work of 100 scholars, who produced the JSE, to be viewed in a very different user friendly manner. It is like vulture energy; takes the dead rotting stuff and transmutes it to life. Time for us humans to discover the secret of the vulture energy.
It makes it easy to segregate the original meaning from the way the INTERPRETERS saw the meaning of the word in relation to the scripture and what words were actually decided upon.
We can more readily distinguish the difference between a word meaning, interpretation of what was meant and what was actually decided upon.
Not necessarily a diabolical scheme to deceive. The religious leaders of the mid 1600s AD were challenged to interpret scripture that matched with the current held teachings, beliefs and religious myths.
The challenge to the team of 100 in the mid 1800s AD, was that they were trying to reconcile the KJB stories with the stories being uncovered while exploring the original languages. We can see many discrepancies were revealed. Subsequently we have had 1100+ more interpretations of the Bible; each one an endeavor to bring forth the meaning of the original text.
We can study the scripture from the words chosen by the religious leaders of 1600 AD for the rest of eternity and we will get the same viewpoint.
Or we can study the scripture using the meaning of the original texts and get quite a different viewpoint. Choice has always been ours.
The time of attempting to change other by controlling with rules, shame, blame and threats of eternal torment is over.
Today we have the resources to break this information out into a different format. A color coded format that enhances the ability to follow the rabbit trail of word formation and meaning. To the end that we reclaim our true identity, the DIVINE CHILD.
However, I believe, that unless one has spent 20 years with only two books, the JSE and the KJB; creating this type of database would not be possible. The depth of understanding how this unique language works, is what created the database. I did not set out for any goal except understanding. The database simply created itself in the process.
The depth of understanding what the original 66 books are about, cannot be found without knowing how the unique language functions. This blog site has many examples of that.
The 66 were chosen from among thousands of documents; all of which were probably expressing some of the same viewpoints of how creation works.
Religious history shows us that new ideas are not readily embraced by religious orders. Many have suffered under the persecution resulting from the rejection of new ideas about the old.
That is what religion is about; casting in concrete belief ideas and systems that resist change. Creation is all about change; constant change.
Religion writes laws that prevent. Creation never prevents anything from changing. Due to its very nature of consant change.
Why is there an unnumbered word that means neutral four; in the New Testament?
The answer lies in the Old Testament. Again, let me repeat there is no New Testament without the Old.
When we understand that the spelled out word four is far more than a number, wisdom beings to dawn in our souls and memories.
A neutral four is four things separated; they are neutral. Neither active PUNCTUREDFEMALE. nor REMEMBEREDMALE words.
A REMEMBEREDMALE word is just that, remembered, recalled, reformed, rearranged; whatever term we wish to use.
A REMEMBEREDMALE four is not found in the NT in so far as I have discovered. In the Old it FOUR means COPULATIVE and when looked at through the order of the letters it means a COPULATIVE DOOR. A revolving door; one that open and closes.
Perhaps we have forgotten how that DOOR was formed and what it was for. What came through it.
We can study and have been studying the words used by the INTERPRETERS of the Bible until doomsday. This leads to the same place RELIGIOUS MYTHS. Which abounded long before the written word was ever produced.
It is the same definition for crazy ….doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different outcome.
Or we can use the Strong Bridge and glean from the original word meanings. This has been extremely difficult and laborious up until now. However, with the database about to be released, the task becomes much simpler and much easier to decipher and reconstruct what the original authors intended.
The English words are merely the starting point that leads us to the Strong Bridge. The keys will open that COPULATING DOOR of wisdom and give us a much deeper broader understanding of the original text. What did the many authors intend to convey?
When we use the keys to unlock the mystery of yesterday; we discover something other than shame, blame, sin, devil, punishment, toil, work, slavery, etc. All of which are part of the religious myths we have so long believed had a basis of truth.
True seekers of truth will find answers long searched for when these keys are used to discover the meaning of the symbols the elders put to paper.
For example the white skin that had supremacy was not white skinned people; but the ICE that held the earth captive for a long long while.
How many have suffered been enslaved under this wrong impression?