It would seem logical that the learned church fathers who prepared the manuscripts for the printing of the KJB would have had access to the original texts. The texts from which they interpreted the 66 books. The same text used almost 300 years later by the team of 100 scholars used to shed light upon the original writings.
If so, then why did they only translate a handful of innocuous words? Words whose true meanings would not in any way detract from the religious myths that had been taught for hundreds of years.
Why did they use the transliterated groups of letters; which were not words. But represent the true meaning in the original languages. Why in some cases did they give us the meaning of those transliterated groups of letters. Then using the same group of transliterated letters add a capital, which was then used as a word; instead of the true meaning of the word? Capital letters infer the name of some person, place or important thing.
If on the other hand, for some reason, they did not have access to the same original documents as the 100 scholars that developed the James Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance; then what did they use as the basis for the Biblical stories? Stories, i.e. religious myths that had been taught for hundreds of years prior to the Bible.
Not to mention the glut of added English words to tell the myths.
Revelation tells us that it is a very little book; sweet in the mouth; bitter in the belly. Bitters are digestive aids. First we must digest out all of those added English words. Then use the true meaning of words used by the original authors.
What is left is a very tiny book. What is noticeable absent is the concepts of sin, shame, blame, guilt, judgement, condemnation, etc. What we discover is the view of the authors who scribed the 66 books between 1845BC to 70AD. A view of creation, the passing of the ages; the stories written in the heavens.
There are no translations. There is only interpretations and thousands of other Bibles all based on the KJB. None of the original texts were written in Latin, nor Greek. They were written in Chaldean and Hebrew using words from many different languages, Persian, Babylonian, Aramaic, Egyptian, Oriental, Syrian, etc. Not to mention words whose original languages were not identified. None of these languages use capital letters.
Understanding How a Word is Formed Increases our Understanding
The manuscripts from which the Bible was translated, were written over a time frame approximately 1845BC to70AD. Scribed by a variety of authors in a variety of places, using a variety or words from a variety of languages.
To decipher this Sweet Little Book about Creation we need to understand how each word in the original text was formed. Meanings do not change. FIRE in any language scribed by any symbols and expressed in any sound; still means FIRE.
Fire happens to be one of the very few Primary words in the Old Testament. Actually I have only found 7 of them. Six of them are neutral words. One is the puncturedfemale word for a neutral word, the word is BROTHER/BROTHER.
We cannot possibly understand this if we insist on gender, which is infused by the nature of the English language during the translation. Neutral brother in this case is a primary word doing nothing but holding place. It is a building block. Brother is the growth process; but still a primary word. A primary building block without permanent measure, it is growing, changing, evolving. The graphic below is a better portrayal of this than words
The building blocks are held together by another PRIMARY WORD, BOND the glue which is translated as mother, still a neutral word.
Out of the BOND comes the word meaning, MOTHER MEASUREMENT translated as cubit. See the arrow on the following graphic. These are neutral, non gender words.
This graphic depicts the above description for better understanding. The BOND is neutral, the CUBIT is neutral, but the measures,height, width, depth, corners, angles, columns, copper, brass, socket, gleam, light, termination, testimony are all puncturedfemale words.
If this is female gender, then male gender has no height, width, depth, angles, sockets, etc.
There are very, very few REMEMBEREDMALE words. Grasping the concept of NO GENDER is vital to understanding the original Sweet Little Book of Creation principles, based on Egyptian math Will Add.
When we make a word mean mother as a female gender person we cannot see the BOND, the glue. Nor can we see the building blocks, the primary words let alone the primitive roots.
See the graphic below, available to premium subscribers. The JSE numbers are not provided, however personal discovery will uncover them.