From the viewpoint of the unique language of the 66 books that are the foundation of the Bible; we see that there is only THIS. THAT is only an extension; an expansion of THIS. THIS is inclusive of all that ever was, is or will be.
Today we use the words this and that as separators of them and us, you and me; divisions that cause exclusions, wars, divisiveness, anger, angst and dis-ease.
What if we took the view from the past and saw only THIS,…ONE…nothing else?
There is much more to THIS viewpoint of the past. 14 different words with 14 different meanings were interpreted as THIS. We must not lose the rabbit trail of the past.
Newer editions of the JSE have removed the ancient landmarks….the numbers applied by the JSE team…most likely due to thinking that we know what the word THIS MEANS.
In today’s world we understand….The viewpoint of the 66 books have quite a different view point. There is THIS, THIS and SHEEP (all three of these are interpreted as the neutral this, known today to identify something close by.
If you have been following the blogs then you understand the difference between the black, blue and red words. Their functions are quite different and quite important in understanding the unique language of 1845BC to 70AD
The three words mentioned above appear more than 400 times each, that is more than 1200 scriptures where the true meaning is buried under today’s THIS. With no way to discover the true meaning…..unless we go back to the 1940 edition of the JSE.
The new database about to be released on this website will preserve and make user friendly the JSE dictionary portion. However, unless we are careful to maintain the integrity of the original work that connects specific numbers to specific scriptures…..we will lose the work of more than 100 persons ……person who by hand with pen and paper documented and gave to us a way to understand the original text.
Do we care enough to dig deeper? Look more closer. See from a different point of view?
Do we carel whether or not future generations will have access to this incredible work?
Or not???? Or do we prefer to continue passing on the religious myths that abound upon the planet? We do have choice. We do have free will.
Where Did This Saying Come From? What Does it Represent?
The source is unknown but the principle is not. As always the reference is back to what our pen wrote 1845BC to 70AD; scrolls that are the supposed source of the interpreted works called Bible. There are no translations in circulation to the public. Are there any true translations? One can only wonder.
Math, in those writings is not arithmetic. If arithmetic principles are applied to the words, that English supposes are merely numbers; the mathematical principles are lost.
Ever wonder why there are words one, two, three, four, thousands, hundred etc. instead of 1, 2, 3, 4, 1000, 100, in the Bible? They represent mathematical principles…..not arithmetic principles of adding, subtracting, multiplying, etc..
Take anything and break it into three pieces; not thirds of equal measure as arithmetic would insist; but three pieces; which is still thirds/thirds. Although, they could be equal; it is not a requirement and has nothing to do with the math principle being used.
We can start from the whole which is either neutral or rememberedmale. That starting point is determined by the state of process. Either stage can be complete or complete word, representing something.
Break the complete or complete into three parts and it becomes puncturedfemale . The three parts are separated and something is happening or can happen.
When the third parts are rejoined; no matter what has happened to them; perhaps the shapes or the amounts were changed….then something has been or is completed. It has been REMEMBEREDMALE. Put into a new form. Three in one. One is always neutral.
Martin Luther called this the trinity; father, son and holy (whole) spirit. It is not exclusive to this interpretation. Nonetheless father, son and holy spirit are neutral words….they have nothing to do with gender….they represent roles in the creation.
There is much more to be learned and applied to these mathematical words; not today. Grab hold of the mathematical principles and apply them to the writings on this website and gain understanding. Note the designated roles of rememberedmale and puncturedfemale words; which have absolutely nothing to do with gender; easily seen just be looking at them.
We wrote that we could have all of our sister wisdom that we desire….but above all else, GET UNDERSTANDING. That is what the past 20+ years of diligently interacting with only two books, the James Strong Exhaustive Concordance; 1940 edition and the King James Bible to which it is keyed.
The keys were developed by 100 persons in the 1800s. They built a bridge between the Bible and the original text. Any of the 1100+ versions of the English can be used; but first one must ascertain what words were used in the KJB.
Now this STRONG bridge has been around; but has had very little use as it can be cumbersome to uncover the rabbit trail of any given word….tracing it back to its root meaning. This however, sheds great light on what any word actually meant.
That is what the 20+ years have wrought, a database whereby it is much easier to get a clear understanding of what we wrote.
The above mathematical (not arithmetic) principles add greatly in gaining that understanding. Four is always rememberedmale ; but the four parts are always neutral.
The database will be put online, in the not too distant future, so anyone can determine for themselves what our pen actually meant, intended to mean in the scrolls of 1845BC to 70AD.