It would seem logical that the learned church fathers who prepared the manuscripts for the printing of the KJB would have had access to the original texts. The texts from which they interpreted the 66 books. The same text used almost 300 years later by the team of 100 scholars used to shed light upon the original writings.
If so, then why did they only translate a handful of innocuous words? Words whose true meanings would not in any way detract from the religious myths that had been taught for hundreds of years.
Why did they use the transliterated groups of letters; which were not words. But represent the true meaning in the original languages. Why in some cases did they give us the meaning of those transliterated groups of letters. Then using the same group of transliterated letters add a capital, which was then used as a word; instead of the true meaning of the word? Capital letters infer the name of some person, place or important thing.
If on the other hand, for some reason, they did not have access to the same original documents as the 100 scholars that developed the James Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance; then what did they use as the basis for the Biblical stories? Stories, i.e. religious myths that had been taught for hundreds of years prior to the Bible.
Not to mention the glut of added English words to tell the myths.
Revelation tells us that it is a very little book; sweet in the mouth; bitter in the belly. Bitters are digestive aids. First we must digest out all of those added English words. Then use the true meaning of words used by the original authors.
What is left is a very tiny book. What is noticeable absent is the concepts of sin, shame, blame, guilt, judgement, condemnation, etc. What we discover is the view of the authors who scribed the 66 books between 1845BC to 70AD. A view of creation, the passing of the ages; the stories written in the heavens.
There are no translations. There is only interpretations and thousands of other Bibles all based on the KJB. None of the original texts were written in Latin, nor Greek. They were written in Chaldean and Hebrew using words from many different languages, Persian, Babylonian, Aramaic, Egyptian, Oriental, Syrian, etc. Not to mention words whose original languages were not identified. None of these languages use capital letters.
The basic building blocks of religion are beliefs, (disbeliefs), ideas, systems, models, expectations, behaviors (acceptable/unacceptable). The concepts that adherents build lives upon and around.
These building blocks become solidified into walls of separation between the different religious constructs.
Each system insisting that it is the correct religion and all else must conform to that system; otherwise known as government. Government is the entity that governs (disallows) the behavior according to the building blocks of the systemic religious adherents.
Religion is about dissing; as opposed to allowing.
Remove the dis from disallowing and what is left is allowing. Making room. All things work together for good; but only when working together. Working together would be in opposition to warring against each other.
Dominance, subjugation, war, conflict are all rooted in religion. Christianity gets the Oscar award for the most people killed. No other religion can come close to that distinction.
Today’s estimates are that up to 90% of the indigenous people of the Americas perished under the Christian cross. 11 million alone in one silver mine. A mountain, which today has a museum and a statue of Mary. A symbolic honoring of the place where one religion forced another to work underground for 6 months at a time. Mining silver for the King and Queen sitting under the cross claiming the right to subjugate those who did not believe.
Yet the market place if full of Christian finger pointing at other religious systems. Justifying the judgements by the belief that one religious system is better than another.
The basic tenet of Christianity is love they neighbor, James 2:8….. but it gets lost in the governing principles of saving everyone else. Saving by warring against, is a misshaped building block. It is not one of the building blocks of the original text.(1845BC – 70AD)
Why?…. because that is only half of the scripture…love thy neighbor AS THYSELF. Religion does not teach to honor and love self; but to deny and denigrate self; subjugate self….no wonder we are at war against our self.
Religion is about disallowing by regulating rules. Remove the dis from dismay and what is left is may. Remove dis from discourage and what is left is courage. Remove the dis from disappointment and what is left is appointment, etc. etc. etc.
The three major religions of the world, Christianity, Islam and Judaism all claim that the first 5 books of the Bible are the WORD OF GOD…and must be obeyed…..yet continue to kill each other according to the the governing principles behind each of these three.
Time to go back and discover (i.e. remove the religious covering veil), reclaim the thoughts and ideas of the authors of the original 66 writings; purported to be the basis for the Bible.
The STRONG BRIDGE DATABASE will facilitate that unveiling process. Eliminating hours of thumbing through pages to try and decipher what any given scripture actually said in the days and times that it was scribed on paper.
The revelations of the original authors can be uncovered, reconstituted. Which of course will dismantle the religious veil. What is under that veil of religious myths can be exposed.
The surprises that await on the other side of the STRONG BRIDGE are manifold. Not new data; but a new way to utilize the work of 100 scholars. An incredible feat for the mid 1800s.
Question is how will that unveiling occur?
A Power point slideshow will be posted on this website; to being the process of education of how to use this new way of looking at an 100 + year old research.
No more religious disallowing ….disallowing that says it is impossible to reclaim the truth of those writings…due to language difficulties.
Bible interpreters decided that a word meaning midday should be interpreted as NOON and SOUTH .
To be a translated word requires the meaning to be retained in the new language. Midday expressed as NOON is an example of an interpretation. An interpretation that is not, in this case, misleading.
However using the word SOUTH where MIDDAY was used in the original text, is misleading at the very least.
Which of us would read the English word SOUTH and come to the conclusion that it meant MIDDAY? Would there be even one person that would arrive at this conclusion?
We can dissect the baked cake. Use a microscope of the highest power and never see the eggs, shortening, salt, sugar, milk, vanilla, flour, etc. The same is true when we try to understand the original text by dissecting the English words that were used in the Bible. Many of them unrepresentative and even contrary to the original meanings.
The following graphic shows how the word MIDDAY was formed. Part of the formation is a PUNCTUREDfemale word. These types of words have nothing to do with gender. They do, however express something very clearly.
This is one example of how the database will easily give us information so that we can individually decide whether or not the Bible is an accurate document. I have no intention of making that decision for anyone. Have full intention of providing a valuable precious gift to the world. Who chooses to open the gift remains to be seen.
Take a look at the graphic and how this word was formed. This is a very simple word; some words are very complicated in their formation. Examples of that will appear in the future.
Where does the word Satan come from?
In the original text of the OLD Testament there a word that means opponent is TRANSLITERATED into the letters s a t a n. Religious interpreters of the New Testament made the s a capital letter and treated the four letters as a word, i.e Satan.
Transliterated letters are not words. They are symbolic of the original word. We use this all the time in going back and forth between languages.
To be translated the letters s a t a n must result in a word that is equal to opponent.
When the letter s was made a capital letter it inferred in English that it was the name of a person, place or important thing. Religion teaches that the word Satan is a spiritual being that desires to destroy humans. Cannot answer the question, who/what created Satan? Or at best says that God made Satan to teach us lessons.
Interestingly another word that means hurtful was INTERPRETED as meaning a masculine devil. But these words were used in the Bible…bad, evil, grievous, harm, lewd, malicious, wicked, wickedness. Wonder why masculine devil was not used? These are English chosen words they are not word meanings taken from the original text. (more…)
John 10:12 “He that is a hireling and not the shepherd; whose own the sheep are not; seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth; and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep.”
This story seems to be about a big bad wolf that catches the sheep or so the religious myth is taught.
WOLF is the key word here in this blog. The original text does not use the word WOLF. The word in the original text means: whitish hair.
Whitish hair is a word that is derived from another word meaning white which is derived from another word meaning LIGHT. The transliterated letters for LIGHT is (L U K E).
SHEEP is another key word. The original text does not use the word SHEEP. The word in the original text means SOMETHING THAT WALKS FORWARD This word is formed from two different words.
Something that walks forward is derived from the word meaning FORE and a word that means PACE which is derived from an UNNUMBERED WORD that means walk.
Incidentally this word that means walk which is not given a number in the JSE has a huge number of words growing from this base word. Look for future blogs regarding what comes out of walk.
The INTERPRETERS decided that WHITISH HAIR was a wolf and that SOMETHING THAT WALKS FORWARD was sheep.
You decide is this an accurate interpretation of the original author’s writings? Or merely a parallel.
Remember the parables? There are many many more parables than the few cited in the GIFT (Matthew) of the Mark and the LIGHT (Luke).
Sounds to me more like the night encroaches and the light becomes whitish rather than yellow/orange/red as the sun walks forward.
There is no NEW without the OLD. In the OLD we have three different meanings for the word THIS used by the INTERPRETERS of the Bible text. There is no differentiation between NMF words. That is the gift of the 100 scholars who developed the JSE in the mid 1800s.
- NEUTRAL word meaning this. It functions just like an English word, indicating something, this table, this shoe, this sun. etc.
- REMEMEMBERED (interpreted as a male) word, functions same as the neutral; this table, this shoe, this sun, etc.
- SHEEP ( a PUNCTURED i.e. female) word identified by the JSE team in 1800s; was used by interpreters in the 1600s as THIS.
When we understand the function of NMF words, we can better understand the original text. A study of the word SHEEP interpreted as THIS reveals a whole different view point.
Night encroaching on daylight fits with the meaning of SHEEP land.
Wolf preying on sheep is A RELIGIOUS MYTH. Good intentions still cause great harm.
Word trees always produce their own kind of fruit. Oranges do not grow on apple trees. That principle applies to words. Up down not appear on a down tree unless the word means up and down.
The database will make it much easier to uncover the original meanings. Enabling us to reclaim what we wrote 1845BC to 70 AD.
I do not believe in a diabolic scheme to deceive the populous with the first public Bible. Nor any subsequent editions of the Bible. However, it is time to reclaim the truth of our pen.
Why is there an unnumbered word that means neutral four; in the New Testament?
The answer lies in the Old Testament. Again, let me repeat there is no New Testament without the Old.
When we understand that the spelled out word four is far more than a number, wisdom beings to dawn in our souls and memories.
A neutral four is four things separated; they are neutral. Neither active PUNCTUREDFEMALE. nor REMEMBEREDMALE words.
A REMEMBEREDMALE word is just that, remembered, recalled, reformed, rearranged; whatever term we wish to use.
A REMEMBEREDMALE four is not found in the NT in so far as I have discovered. In the Old it FOUR means COPULATIVE and when looked at through the order of the letters it means a COPULATIVE DOOR. A revolving door; one that open and closes.
Perhaps we have forgotten how that DOOR was formed and what it was for. What came through it.
We can study and have been studying the words used by the INTERPRETERS of the Bible until doomsday. This leads to the same place RELIGIOUS MYTHS. Which abounded long before the written word was ever produced.
It is the same definition for crazy ….doing the same thing over and over again expecting a different outcome.
Or we can use the Strong Bridge and glean from the original word meanings. This has been extremely difficult and laborious up until now. However, with the database about to be released, the task becomes much simpler and much easier to decipher and reconstruct what the original authors intended.
The English words are merely the starting point that leads us to the Strong Bridge. The keys will open that COPULATING DOOR of wisdom and give us a much deeper broader understanding of the original text. What did the many authors intend to convey?
When we use the keys to unlock the mystery of yesterday; we discover something other than shame, blame, sin, devil, punishment, toil, work, slavery, etc. All of which are part of the religious myths we have so long believed had a basis of truth.
True seekers of truth will find answers long searched for when these keys are used to discover the meaning of the symbols the elders put to paper.
For example the white skin that had supremacy was not white skinned people; but the ICE that held the earth captive for a long long while.
How many have suffered been enslaved under this wrong impression?