"All writings on this blog site refer to my passionate close relationship of 20+ years with two books only; the James Strong Exhaustive Concordance 1940 edition and the King James Bible published 1640AD. The JSE is keyed to the KJB. The JSE is the work of 100 scholars who in the 1800s AD built a bridge for those who desire to cross over to the other side of the religious myths perpetrated upon the planet."
existent open wide free dog (star) descended.
versus the Bible story about 2 men Joshua and Caleb who crossed the Jordan River
The dog star, the sun star, was renamed Serius by the Greeks and the Bible interpreters called it Caleb. All English renditions of the Bible state they are translated from the KING JAMES BIBLE according to the GREEK.
The original stories were not written Greek. They were written, mostly in Hebrew with words from the languages of Babylonian, Chaldean, Hebrew, Aramaic, Egyptian, Persian and a variety of other languages; some unidentified.
So let us look at another story about the existent open wide free dog (star) from the original text..
existent open wide free builds perpetuity….dog(star) builds, (what) will be prepared
vs Joshua the son of Nun….Caleb the son of Jephunneh.
Which view the original text or the religious myth view gives us the most information? Let us look at a specific scripture.
Numbers 26:65 For the LORD had said of them, They shall surely die in the wilderness. And there was not left a man of them, save…Caleb the son of Jephunneh, and Joshua the son of Nun.
If the existent open wide free dog(star) was all that was left….then there was still the sun in the heavens.
- If Caleb and Joshua were the only human male beings left….how did they reproduce themselves?
- How do two male persons bring forth life? In order to answer this question; other myths have to be created to substantiate the religious myth that the existent open wide free dog(star) was two male persons.
What if we use the original viewpoint and let the words of the original text tell us their stories? Instead of the long held religious viewpoint that existed long before the first Bible was released to the general public. Evidences exist all over the world’ cathedrals, monasteries with depictions of Crucifixions built long before the Bible was developed for the masses.
The Bible was simply a way to reinforce the long held religious beliefs and a way to keep the masses aligned with those beliefs….saying this book is the WORD OF GOD and MUST BE OBEYED. Question is which God? Whose God?
Thus 1100+ interpretations of the Bible trying to figure out how to obey something that seems so contrary. Something that is interpreted by thousands of different denominations and non-denominations, as well as the general public. None agreeing with each other; just what we are to obey.
The new database will make this a much simpler task. The information at the back of the James Strong Exhaustive Concordance, the numbering reference system is being brought into a a different format….same information….just much simpler, faster and easier to use than the hard copy.
Everyone can search for themselves and decide what they choose to believe….the long held religious myths about human beings or the beautiful stories about creation and its processes.
This database does not replace the hard copy; but is an addendum to it, to facilitate an easier way to explore, so each one can come to their own conclusions. There is only one of us. one human race; time for us to get it together. Not as clones; but as beautiful individual expressions of creation. Everything is our elder and we the little kid on the block have much to learn.
We will be able to pull up all sorts of data, such as the primitive root words and see what grows on them. Compare them at a glance. We will not find oranges growing on grape vines; nor apples on a cherry tree.
For the first time we will be able to pull up all of the unused root words; which were not assigned a number by the JSE team; but were identified and the meanings of those unused root words was given. Now they can be broken out and see what grows on them.
We will be able to pull out all of the puncturedfemale and rememberedmale words and see they gave absolutely nothing to do with gender. Have everything to do with form and function and how the authors used the same words in different ways.
There are not many words in the original texts; just a lot of repetitions…these can now be reduced down into a simple dictionary of the simple meanings of the original text.